The Kudurru Fragment of the Montserrat Museum [with Ignacio Márquez Rowe] moreIn: Aula Orientalis, vol. 15 (1997), pp. 195–200. |
40 views |
Assyriology and Kudurru
The Kudurru Fragment of the Montserrat Museum
Ignacio Mdrquez Rowe — C.S.I.C., Madrid
Cornelia Wunsch — Barcelona / Heidelberg
This piece "was acquired after a long bargain from a person from Nasriyeh who belonged to the sect
of the subba, or disciples of Saint John the Baptist" on March, 4th 1923 by P. Bonaventura Ubach as he himself
recorded it in his Dietari ("la vengue, despres de molts precs, un individu del poble de Nasriyeh, pertanyent
a la secta dels subba, o deixebles de Sant Joan Baptista"). "Some days later, the dealer who settled the affair
between him and the owner of the fragment came to him to claim the piece back for a Jew had offered him then
the double price he had been paid. P. Ubach persuaded the dealer with conviction that the piece in question was
unfortunately already on its way to Spain" -so were we told by P. Guiu Camps who keeps carefully "somnis
i records del temps passat" (like the wise old man in J. Verdaguer's L'Atlantida) and to whom this contribution
is dedicated with our most sincere friendship and admiration.1
This highly appreciated fragment is now exhibited in one of the Western Asiatic antiquities rooms in
the Museu Bfblic of Montserrat catalogued with the number 730.001. It is the upper part of a kudurru of dark
grey limestone. The original stone stele of irregular long shape must have been relatively large, to judge from
the maximum preserved dimensions of the fragment: the height is about 21 cm, the width about 20 cm (note
that the edges are not fully preserved) and the thickness about 13.5 cm. Like other kudurrus, MM 730.001 has
a rather rounded top and two morphologically distinct faces, one slightly convex and the other somewhat
flatter.
The reason for the value and appeal of this piece can easily be deduced: the upper fragment preserves
the carved images representing the symbols of the deities. In addition one must also mention the good quality of
the style of the relief as well as the rather good state of preservation of the symbols. The Akkadian text of the
contract, which possibly described a real estate transaction, was separated from the relief by two tori and was
originally written on both sides of the kudurru. Indeed, few isolated traces of cuneiform signs, almost illegible,
l. Note the following abbreviations used in this paper: BBSl = L.W. King. Babylonian Boundary-Stones and Memorial-Tablets in the British
.Museum. London 1912: Seidl = U. Seidl, Die babylonischen Kudurru-Reliefs. Symbole mesopotamischer Gottheiten. Orbis BibltCUS et Orientalis 87.
Freiburg 1989: Sumer 1 = F. Basmachi. "Small Bas-Reliefs in the Iraq Museum", Sumer 7 (1951) 58-79; Sumer 36 = F. Rashid, "The Titles of King
Marduk-Shabik-Ziri 1082-1070 B.C.", Sumer 36 (1980) 124-149; Sumer 38 = K. Al-Admi, "A New Kudurru of Marduk-nadin-ahhe IM 90585", Sumer
38(1982) 121-133.
Aula Orientalis 15(1997) 195-200
195
L MARQUEZ ROWE - C. WUNSCH
can be found on both sides (one may restore tentatively in the first line of the convex face the signs
A.S[A.ME]S). The lines of the inscription are divided by rulings and measure about 0.7 cm; on the other hand,
it is not possible to determine whether the text was also distributed in columns like in other examples due to
the badly damaged state of preservation of the lower part of the piece.
As a result, the study of the kudurru fragment MM 730.001 will be, as is often the case, a study of the
iconography.
The symbols
The rather damaged flat face of MM 730.001 preserves part of two composite divine symbols. These
are included in a register, divided on the lower part by the two tori which separate the inscription and are
isolated from the other symbols by another upper torus. The two composite symbols, proper of the kudurrus
from the Xlth century B.C. on, represent the deities Nabu and Marduk: their emblems, the wedge-shaped stylus
with a tablet and the triangular-headed spade respectively, stood each on a podium from which the protome
of a snake-dragon extended horizontally. Of Nabu's symbol, only the head of the dragon is preserved; whereas
Marduk's altar supporting the triangular-headed spade is fully preserved as well as part of the body of the
snake-dragon.
Above this first register, one can find the symbols of the celestial gods. On the right end and bent on the upper
slightly round edge of the kudurru, the symbol of Samas is entirely preserved. The sun is here elaborately
depicted as a disc enclosing the four-pointed star with radiating wavy lines between each of the points. To the
left of Samas is part of the crescent moon, the symbol of Sin, which was probably flanked in turn by the
eight-pointed star Istar-Venus completely broken away. This 'register' is closed on the upper edge by the snake,
the symbol of Istaran. Its head should presumably be restored on the right upper edge on account of the broader
size of the body. Its lower part would then run along the left edge of the stone, like in other examples, and
would thus divide graphically the two halves of the kudurru.
The upper edge of MM 730.001 shows also two other divine symbols. Both the eagle-head of Zababa
(whose staff is not preserved) and the walking bird, the emblem of Papsukkal. are located on the right side with
no distinct division and are facing the convex front of the kudurru. One should note the high quality of the
carving in depicting the details and parts of these birds (e.g. the different depth of the incised lines in drawing
the feathers or eyes).
On the same level of the relief, that means still on the upper edge, the scorpion, representing Ishara.
dominates the scene of the relief work, both in size and style.
Below and thus on the upper part of the convex face of the kudurru, the entire outline and portions of
the relief of the lamp, the symbol of Nusku, are preserved. To the left, it is possible to distinguish the traces
of the outline of the 'omega' symbol of Ninhursanga whose relief is completely broken away. This is the last
preserved symbol before reaching the row of images which stands directly over the two tori that separate the
relief from the cuneiform text.
This row shows the triad Anu, Enlil and Ea represented by three pedestals (which exhibit the same
design and are finished in the same way as the one of Marduk on the opposite face of the stone) supporting
their respective symbols. Anu and Enlil are identified by the multi-horned crowns. As for Ea, only a portion
of the pedestal is preserved; on the basis of other kudurrus where these three symbols do also occur, one could
restore upon this altar either the curved staff with ram's head or the turtle, often combined with the protome
196
THE KUDURRU FRAGMENT OF THE MONTSERRAT MUSEUM
of goat-fish extended horizontally from the pedestal.2 Finally, to the left of the triad the dog. representing Gula,
is sitting on the rear legs and is almost entirely preserved.
Classification
Since only few scattered traces of signs from the text of MM 730.001 are preserved, the only criterium
which may help to date this stone fragment will be the style of the relief. For this purpose, we shall, of course,
refer to the essential study of U. Seidl where a stylistic-chronological typology of all kudurrus known up to
1989 can be found.
On the basis then of the nature and form of the divine symbols as well as their spatial distribution on
the relief, we suggest to catalogue MM 730.001 within the so-called "Canonical C" group. This group includes
all kuduiTus from Marduk-nadin-ahhe down to Marduk-ahhe-eriba. dated thus to the first half of the Xlth.
century B.C.
A short list of representative similar examples of "Canonical C" kudurrus could be the following: 1M
90585 (Sumer 38 127-133 = Seidl pp. 223s.) of Marduk-nadin-ahhe, and BM 90841 (BBSt PI. LIU,
LXIIlss. = Seidl no. 79) presumably from the same reign; or IM 934 (Sumer 1 PI. V = Seidl no. 84) and
IM 80908 {Sumer 36 145-149 = Seidl p. 224) of Marduk-sapik-zeri. Distinctively, however. MM
730.001 shows, as already mentioned, a clear separate register -where the symbols of Marduk and Nabu
are located- that is absent in these aforementioned examples. In this regard, one may finally refer to
the well-known "Caillou Michaux" of Marduk-nadin-ahhe with its characteristic 'registered' relief.
2. For the symbol of the turtle with and without protome of goat-fish, see respectively Seidl no. 83 (PI. 28d) and BM 90841 (BBSt PI. LXIII
= Seidl no. 79); for the ram-headed staff with protome of goat-fish, see IM 934 (.Sumer 7 PI. V = Seidl no. 84) or IM 90585 (Sumer 38 PI. Ib, 2a pp.
128s. = Seidl pp. 223s.).
197
i. mArquez rowe - c. wunsch
MM 730.001
198
the kudurru fragment of the montserrat museum
199
i. marquez rowe - c. wunsch
200